Evaluation of Enzymatic Potentialities of Bacillus subtilis using as Substrate Different Animal Raw Materials Feed

Authors

  • Mihaela Dumitru Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition (IBNA), 077015 Balotesti, Romania
  • Nicoleta Lefter Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition (IBNA), 077015 Balotesti, Romania
  • Lavinia Idriceanu Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition (IBNA), 077015 Balotesti, Romania
  • Mihaela Habeanu Department of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, National Research and Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition (IBNA), 077015 Balotesti, Romania

Keywords:

enzymatic activity, shake flask fermentation, probiotic

Abstract

In the present investigation, the production of amylase, cellulase, and protease activity by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051a was evaluated on different raw materials (soybean meal, peas, sorghum flour, corn) and combined feed (CF). The effect of various fermentation conditions (24-72 h) on enzymatic production through shake-flask culture (Erlenmeyer 100 mL) in optimum conditions (150 rpm, pH 7.0±0.2, 37◦C) was investigated. The inoculum strain presents 1.907 optical density (OD) 600 nm with a concentration of 1.6 x 109 CFU/mL. The screening showed a capacity of amylase, cellulase, and protease strain production. The maximum amylase level was obtained at 72 h when the strain was cultured in CF fermentation medium (13.19±0.15 U/mL), followed by corn (11.72±0.15 U/mL), peas (9.22±0.11 U/mL), soybean meal (7.29±0.19 U/mL) and sorghum (6.31±0.2 U/mL). For production of cellulase by DNS method, the activity was noticed in corn (4.39±0.04 U/mL), sorghum (4.05±0.02 U/mL), peas (2.94±0.06 U/mL), soybean meal (2.87±0.04 U/mL) and CF medium (1.41±0.02 U/mL). Maximum protease activity was observed after 24 h in CF (4.91±0.08 U/mL), with minimum enzyme production in the rest of fermentation media, both at 48 h and 72 h. In conclusion, qualitative analysis revealed that Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051a could be successfully used for high scale production of amylase, cellulase and to less extend protease, particularly in fermented medium containing CF or corn, and may be considered a potential candidate for supplementation of animal feed.

References

Pant, G., Prakash, A., Pavani, J.V.P., Bera, S., Deviram, G.V.N.S., Kumar, A., Panchpuri, M., Prasuna, R.G., Production, optimization and partial purification of protease from Bacillus subtilis. J of Taibah university for Science, 2014, 9(1), 50-55.

Merghni, A., Leban, N., Behi, A., Bakhrouf, A. Evaluation of the probiotic properties of Bacillus spp. strains isolated from Tunisian hypersaline environments. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 8(4), 398-405. https://doi: 10.5897/AJMR2013.5457.

Larsen, N., Thorsen, L., Kpikpi, E.N., Lauridsen, B.S., Cantor, M.D., Nielsen, B., Brockmann, E., Derckx, P.M.F., Jespersen, L. Characterization of Bacillus spp. strains for use as probiotic additives in pig fed. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol., 2013, 1-1. https://doi:10.1007/s00253-013-5343-6.

Latorre, J.D., Velasco, X.H., Wolfenden, R.E., Vicente, J.L., Wolfenden, A.D., Menconi, A., Bielke, L.R., Hargis, B.M., Tellez, G. Evaluation and selection of Bacillus species based on enzyme production, antimicrobial activity, and biofilm synthesis as direct-fed microbial candidates for poultry. Front Vet Sci., 2016, 3(95), 1-9, USA.

Simair, A.A., Qureshi, A.S., Khushk, I., Ali, C.H., Lashari, S., Bhutto, M.A., Mangrio, G., S., Lu, C. Production and partial characterization of ????-amylase enzyme from Bacillus spp. BCC 01-50 and potential applications. BioMed Research International, 2017, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9173040.

Swain, M.R., Kar, S., Padmaja, G., Ray, R.C. Partial characterization and optimization of production of extracellular α-amylase from Bacillus subtilis isolated from culturable cow dung microflora. Pol J Microbiol., 2006, 55(4):289–296.

Dumitru, M., Habeanu, M. Production and evaluation of extracellular enzymes from Bacillus licheniformis in different raw materials used in animal feed. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, 2021a, LXIV(1), 129-136. ISSN 2285-5750.

Dumitru, M., Sorescu, I., Habeanu, M., Tabuc, C., Idriceanu, L., Jurcoane, S. Preliminary characterisation of Bacillus subtilis strain use as a dietary probiotic bio-additive in weaning piglet. Food and Feed Research, 2018, 45 (2), 203‒211.

Ciurescu, C., Dumitru, M., Gheorghe, A., Untea, A., Draghici, R. Effect of Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, bone mineralization, and bacterial population of broilers fed with different protein sources. Poultry Science, 2020, 99(11), 5960‒5971.

Puspasari, F., Radjasa, O.K, Noer, A.S., Nurachman, Z., Syah, Y.M., Van der Maarel, M., Dijkhuizen, L., Janeecek, S., Natalia, D. Raw starch degrading ????-amylase from Bacillus aquimaris MKSC 6.2: isolation and expression of the gene, bioinformatics and biochemical characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2013, 114(1), 108–120. https://doi: 10.1111/jam.12025.

Mitsuiki, S., Mukae, K., Sakai, M., Goto, M., Hayashida, S., Furukawa, K. Comparative characterization of raw starch hydrolyzing ????-amylases from various Bacillus strains. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 37( 4), 410–416, 2005.

Ibrahim, S.E., Amin, H.B.E., Hassan, E.N., Sulieman, A.M.E. Amylase production on solid state fermentation by Bacillus spp. Food and Public Health, 2(1), 30-35. https://doi: 10.5923/j.fph.20120201.06.

Jamrath, T., Lindner, C., Popovic, M.C., Bajpai, R. Production of amylases and proteases by Bacillus caldolyticus from food industry wastes. Food Technol Biotechnol., 2012, 50, 355-361.

Ye, M., Sun, L., Yang, R., Wang, Z., Qi, K. The optimization of fermentation conditions for producing cellulase of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and its application to goose feed. R. Soc. Open Sci., 2017, 4, 1-12.

Manhar, A.K., Bashir, Y., Saikia, D., Nath, D., Gupta, K., Konwar, B.K., Kumar, R., Namsa, N.D., Mandal, M. Cellulolytic potential of probiotic Bacillus subtilis AMS6 isolated fromtraditional fermented soybean (Churpi): An in-vitro study withregards to application as an animal feed additive. Microbiological Research, 2016, 186–187, 62–70.

Murad, H.A., Azzaz, H.H. Cellulase and dairy animal. Feeding. Biotechnology, 2010, 9(3), 238-256.

Haq, I., Abdullah, R., Ashraf, H., Shah, A.H. Isolation and screening of fungi for the biosynthesis of alpha amylase. J. Biotechnol., 2002, 1(2-4), 61-66.

Hmani, H., Daoud, L., Jlidi, M., Jalleli, K., Ali, M.B., Brahim, A.H., Bargui, M., Dammack A., Ali M.B. A Bacillus subtilis strain as probiotic in poultry selection based on in vitro functional properties and enzymatic potentialities. J Int Microbiol Biotechnol., 2017, 44, 1157-1166. https://doi 10.1007/s10295-017-1944-x.

Dumitru, M., Hăbeanu, M., Lefter, N., Gheorghe, A. The effect of Bacillus licheniformis as direct-fed microbial product on growth performance, gastrointestinal disorders and microflora population in weaning piglets. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett., 2020, 25(6), 2060‒2069.

Dumitru, M., Habeanu, M., Sorescu, I., Tabuc, C. Bacillus spp. as a supplemental probiotic in diets for weaned piglets. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2021b, 51(5), 578-586.

Latorre, J.D., Hernandez-Velasco, X., Kogut, M.H., Vicente, J.L., Wolfenden, R., Wolfenden, A., Hargis, B.M., Kuttappan, V.A., Tellez, G. Role of a Bacillus subtilis direct-fed microbial on digesta viscosity, bacterial translocation, and bone mineralization in turkey poults fed with a rye-based diet. Front. Vet. Sci., 2014, 1-5.

Jurcoane, Ș., Diguță F.C., Groposila, C.D.G. General Biotechnology. Practical Applied, 2006, Bucharest.

Blanco, A.S., Durive, O.P., Perez, S.B., Montez, Z.D., Guerra, N.P. Simultaneous production of amylases and proteases by Bacillus subtilis in brewery wastes. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2016, 47(3), 665-674.

Unakal., C., Kallur, R.I., Kaliwal, B.B. Production of α-amylase using banana waste by Bacillus subtilis under solid state fermentation. Biochem Res Int, 2014, 2(4), 1044-1052.

Davis, M.E., Parrott, T., Brown, D.C., de Rodas, B.Z., Johnson, Z.B., Maxwell, C.V., Rehberger, T. Effect of a Bacillus-based directfed microbial feed supplement on growth performance and pen cleaning characteristics of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci., 2008, 86, 1459-1467.

Behera, B.C., Sethi, B.K., Mishra, R.R., Dutta, S.K., Thatoi, H.N. Microbial cellulases – diversity and biotechnology with references to mangrove environment: A review. J of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 15, 197-210.

Ali, S., Hall, J., Soole, K.L., Fontes, C.M.G.A., Hazlewood, G.P., Hirst, B.H., Gilbert, H.J. Targeted expression of microbial cellulases in transgenic animals. Progress in Biotechnology, 1995, 10, 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-0423(06)80111-5.

Santoso, U., Tanaka, K., Ohaniand, S., Saksida, M. Effect of fermented product from Bacillus subtilis on feed efficiency, lipid accumulation and ammonia production in broiler chicks. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 14, 333- 337.

Rukhaiyar, R., Srivastava, S.K. Effect of various carbonsubstrates on a-amylase production from Bacillus species. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1995, 10, 76–82.

Soares, V.F., Castilho, L.R., Bon, E.P.S., Freire, D.M. High-yield Bacillus subtilis protease production by solid-state fermentation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 2005, 121, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:121:1-3:0311.

Zhu, Y.P., Fan, J.F., Cheng, Y.Q., Li, L.T. Improvement of the antioxidant activity of Chinese traditional fermented Okara (Meitauza) using Bacillus subtilis B2. Food Control, 2008, 19, 654–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.07.009.

Zhang, Y., Tan, C., Zhang, X., Xia, S., Jia, C., Eric, K., Abbas, S., Feng, B., Zhong, F. Effects of maltodextrin glycosylation following limited enzymatic hydrolysis on the functional and conformational properties of soybean protein isolate. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 2014, 238 (6), 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2164-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-21