Effects of Plant Secondary Metabolites on Methane Production and Fermentation Parameters in In vitro Ruminal Cultures

Authors

  • Mihaela Giuburuncă Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Manastur 3-5 Str., Romania
  • Adriana Criste Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Manastur 3-5 Str., Romania
  • Daniel Cocan Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Manastur 3-5 Str., Romania
  • Radu Constantinescu Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Manastur 3-5 Str., Romania
  • Camelia Răducu Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Manastur 3-5 Str., Romania
  • Vioara Mireșan Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372, Cluj-Napoca, Manastur 3-5 Str., Romania

Keywords:

greenhouse gases, in vitro, methane, plant secondary metabolites, rumen, ruminal fermentation

Abstract

Enteric fermentation process is of concern worldwide for its contribution to global warming. Methanogenesis process
represents besides its contribution to greenhouse gases emissions an energy loss to the animal. In the last years, new
strategy has been evaluated whether plant secondary metabolites can be used as natural additives to reduce ruminal
methane emissions. The present study investigated the effects of trans-cinnamic, caffeic, p-coumaric acids and
catechin hydrate, four plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) on methane production and fermentation in in vitro
ruminal cultures. The four PSMs were added anaerobically in a 6 mM concentration to 100 ml serum bottles
containing 500 mg grass hay as substrate, 10 ml rumen fluid collected from a fistulated sheep and 40 ml 141 DSM
culture medium. The bottles were incubated at 39 ̊C. The results showed that caffeic (p = 0.058) and p-coumaric (p =
0.052) acids tended to decrease methane production in comparison to control but the decrease was not statistic
significantly at α= 0.05. The other two PSMs had no significant effect on methane production. Addition of PSMs did
not affected the total gas volume, the pH and VFAs profile (P>0.05) in relation to the control (no PSM added).
Caffeic and p-coumaric acids in 6 mM concentration showed promising effects for decreasing ruminal methane
emissions without affecting ruminal fermentation parameters, further experiments with other concentrations needs to
be done.

References

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change),

Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In:

Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis

M., Averyt K.B., Tignor M., Miller H.L, Contribution

of Working Group I for the Fourth Assessment Report

of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New

York, USA, 2007

Jayanegara A., Ruminal methane production on

simple phenolic acids addition in in vitro gas

production method, Media Paternakan, 2009, 32(1), 53-

Moss A.R., Jouany J and Newbold J., Methane

production by ruminants: its contribution to global

warming, Annales De Zootechnie, 2000, 49, 231-253

Martin C., Morgavi D.P. and Doreau M., Methane

mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm

scale, Animal, 2009, 1-15

Guo Y.Q., Liu J.-X., Lu Y., Zhu W.Y., Denman S.E.

and McSweeney C.S., Effects of tea saponin on

methanogenesis, microbial community structure and

expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen microorganisms, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 2008, 47, 421-426

Kim E.T., Kim C.-H., Min K. –S. and Lee S.S.,

Effects of plant extracts on microbial population,

methane emission and ruminal fermentation

characteristics in in vitro.,Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci.,

, 25, 806-811

Wright A.D.G., Kennedy P., O’Neill C.J., Toovey

A.F., Popovski S., Rea S.M., Pimm C.L., Klein L.,

Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization

against rumen methanongens, Vaccine, 2004, 22, 3976-

Hegarty R. S., Bird SH., Vanselow B.A. and

Woodgate R., Effects of the absence of protozoa from

birth or from weaning on the growth and methane

production of lambs, British J. Nutrition, 2008, 100,

-1227

McAllister T.A. and Newbold C.J., Redirecting

rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis, Aust. J.

Exp. Agr., 2008, 48, 7-13

Callaway T.R., Carneiro De Melo A.M. and Russel

J.B., The effect of nisin and monensin on ruminal

fermentation in vitro, Current Microbiology, 1997, 35,

-96

Ungerfeld E.M., Rust S.R., Burnett R.J., Yokoyama

and Wang J.K., Effects of two lipids on in vitro ruminal

methane production, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2005,

, 179-185

Eugène M., Massé D., Chiquette J. and Benchaar

C., Meta-analysis on the effects of lipid

supplementation on methane production in lactating

dairy cows, Canadian J. Anim. Sci., 2008, 88, 331-334

Newbold C.J. and Rode L. M., Dietary additives to

control methanogenesis in the rumen, Int. Congr. Ser.,

, 1293, 138-147

Guan H., Wittenberg K.M., Ominski K.H. and

Krause D.O., Efficacy of ionophores in cattle diets for

mitigation of enteric methane., J. Anim. Sci., 2006, 84,

-1906

Lovett D. K., Stack L.J., Lovell J., Callan B., Flynn

B., Hawkins and O’Mara F.P., Manipulating enteric

methane emissions and animal performance of latelactation dairy cows through concentrate

supplementation at pasture, J. Dairy Sci., 2005, 88,

-2482

Cook S.R., Maiti P.K., Chavez A.V., Benchaar C.,

Beauchemin K.A. and McAllister T.A., Avian (IgY)

anti-methanogen antibodies for reducing ruminal

methane production: in vitro assessment of their

effects, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,

, 48, 260-264

Kim E.T., Kim C.-H., Min K. –S. and Lee S.S.,

Effects of plant extracts on microbial population,

methane emission and ruminal fermentation

characteristics in in vitro.,Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci.,

, 25, 806-811

Bodas R., López S., Fernández M., GarciaGonzáles R., Wallace R.J. and Gonzáles J.S.,

Phytogenic additives to decrease in vitro ruminal

methanogenesis, Options Méditerranéennes, 2009, 85,

-283

Garcia- Gonzáles R., López S., Fernández M. and

Gonzáles J.S., Effects of the addition of some

medicinal plants on methane production in a rumen

simulating fermenter (RUSITEC), Int. Congr. Ser.,

, 1293, 172-175

Woodward S.L., Waghorn G.C., Ulyatt M.J. and

Lassey K.R., Early indication that feeding lotus will

reduce methane emissions from ruminants, Proc. N.Z.

Soc. Anim. Prod., 2001, 61, 23-26

Lila Z.A., Mohammed N., Kanda S., Kamada T.

and Itabashi H., Effect of sarsaponin on ruminal

fermentation with particular references to methane

production in vitro, J.Dairy Sci., 2003, 86, 3330-3336

Hu W.L., Liu J.X., Ye J.A., Wu Y.M., Guo Y.Q.,

Effect of tea saponin on rumen fermentation in vitro.,

Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol., 2005, 120, 333-339

Wang C.J., Wang S.P. and Zhou H., Influences of

flavomycin, ropadiar, and saponin on nutrient

digestibility, rumen fermentation, and methane

emission from sheep, Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol., 2009,

, 157-166

Jayanegara A., Reducing methane emissions from

livestock: nutritional approaches. Proceedings of

Indonesian Students Scientific Meeting (ISSM)-

Institute for Science and Technology Studies (ISTECS)

European Chapter, Delft, The Netherlands, 2008c, 18-

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05